How to 'explain a culture'? Maybe to base the explanation on one's ideas of what (our or their) culture is.. Then, wouldn't this inevitably lead to the conclusion that we prioritize some cultural aspects over some others? or that we consider some aspects as 'cultural' while other as 'natural'?
The whole concept of culture seems to be wide enough to approach it from all perspectives, therefore the need to develop Areas of Knowledge (Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Human Sciences, Arts, etc.). Geertz suggested that "man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun", and that culture were those webs.. Every time we study the world, we carry out an interpretative exercise from the part of the net we are standing, always looking for meaning.
Maybe there is no such a thing as total objectivity, but (individual or group) interpretations of reality. The process of making sense of the world could be the way in which knowledge is ‘created’, while the meanings stand for the justifications needed. An analysis from the knower's perspective is supposed to ‘dissect’ the whole process, reflecting upon the ways of knowing (sense perception, language, emotion, and reason), in order to appreciate the changing character of knowledge and reformulate one’s process as a knower.
